Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LoLo's avatar

I think Councillor Dermody should put aside his personal or national political philosophies: Council has responsibilities for social and economic health and wellbeing of city residents incorporated in strategy documents around this. And provides amenities on behalf of ratepayers - whose interest and needs he should represent first and foremost. We need him to participate and explore and promote increased non- traditional recreational uses within the public spaces of this city . Times are tough. Travel is costly. Community CONNECTION and recreation within the urban boundary is more needed than ever,

Council amenities requires strategy and creative input and review over time to reflect what his ratepayers want and need. Social recreational needs in 2024 are not those of 1984 . Council needs to listen and hear the needs of todays parents, not just say it’s up to you… The concept promoted ( it seems) by Mr Dermody that Council might build a park with green space ( or whatever) and walk away, leaving city-residents to it , (their responsibility), is not best: We gain more with council oversight as co- ordinator, innovator and provider. Especially needed in 2024 are increased non-sporting, non- traditional social -recreational facilities: There are a lot of solitary, car- less, lower- socio- economic residents. A wharf at Donovan pond , French-style low wooden tables and stools for board games in queens park, increased open-space dog-walking open within the city boundary disc golf; all are modern ideas appealing to varied age groups. Adult non- working or retired men in this city are a group not well catered for : It’s not just playgrounds for under 12s and sports fields. I will give an example of Council building a park ,then not reviewing outcomes: This being the construction of Donovan park in the 1970s , designed around vehicular access, in a narrow restricted vehicular corridor within a huge Public reserve space , with the amenities best needed there not having reviewed in fifty years. A passive pond experience, and restricted walking along or on a roadway is not best use? I hope Mr Dermody isnt one who wants to sell it off; please I hope he will participate creatively in how Donovan Park, and the cities reserve lands can be increasingly and creatively used and fostered for the health and well being of those you represent 👍. I Might be being unnecessarily hard or misinterpreted Mr Dermody , but I’m trying to advocate he please put aside reluctance and embrace enthusiasm to re-jig our city’s recreational amenities inventively, JUST AS WE’VE DONE well. in the cbd Let’s get modern and creative and collaborate all together, instead of query the very concept !!

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts